Growing concerns over the impact of CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
emissions from combustion sources on global climate change have prompted numerous research and development projects aimed at developing cost-effective technologies for CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture. One family of technologies being demonstrated at pilot and full scale globally is postcombustion CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture (PCCC) systems that employ amine-based solvents. The captured CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
can be compressed and permanently stored underground or used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). The proximity of North Dakota?s lignite-fired fleet of power plants to potential CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
storage options creates a unique atmosphere for PCCC within the state. However, the aerosols present in lignite flue gas present a challenge for large-scale PCCC at North Dakota power plants. Aerosols can negatively impact the long-term performance of amine-based solvents for CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture. Amine-based solvents are volatile, and aerosols provide nucleation sites where amine vapors can condense. Because aerosols cannot be easily captured at the column outlet using conventional technologies, the amine-laden aerosols escape the system and lead to accelerated solvent losses. Moreover, aerosol components can chemically react with amines to form degradation products that can permanently deactivate the amine, cause fouling, and lead to hazardous emissions. Many of the elements that have been shown to catalyze solvent degradation are present in lignite coals and can exacerbate solvent replacement economics. Understanding this issue is critical to the implementation of solvent-based CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture systems as applied to lignite-fired generation systems. The Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) designed and carried out this project to optimize aerosol mitigation technology for PCCC at a lignite-fired power plant. To meet the goal of this project, the following objectives were identified:<
ul>
<
li>
Determine the effectiveness of a wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) on collection of aerosols at a low-rank coal-fired power station. <
/li>
<
li>
Determine the impact of aerosols on the efficiency and degradation products of amine-based carbon capture systems fired with low-rank fuels.<
/li>
<
/ul>
Work was conducted at Minnkota Power Cooperative?s (MPC?s) Milton R. Young (MRY) Station Unit 2 using a slipstream of flue gas from the outlet of the plant?s flue gas desulfurization (FGD) unit. To gather initial data for sizing and specifying a WESP for this system, a temporary pilot-scale WESP was rented and installed on-site. Several different conditions were tested to examine the impact of flow rate, voltage, and current on WESP performance. The WESP was effective at removing large particulate (>
200 nm) but caused an increase in fine particulate (<
75 nm). Fine particulate material at the inlet and outlet of the WESP was collected, analyzed, and showed that crystalline sulfates carried over from the plant?s FGD unit were being converted to fine aerosols and SO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
was being converted to SO<
sub>
3<
/sub>
through the WESP. Additionally, the high moisture content of the flue gas stream at this sample location also contributed to an overall increase in aerosol mass under some of the test conditions. Using the results from the rented WESP, the project team installed a smaller-scale WESP upstream of the EERC?s slipstream CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture system. Flue gas was routed through a pilot-scale FGD unit to remove SO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
to very low levels (~1 ppm) and then through a direct contact cooler (DCC) to further cool the gas and to remove moisture. The gas exiting the DCC was then routed through the new WESP before passing to the CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
absorber columns. Fluor?s amine-based solvent was used to scrub CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
from the slipstream through a set of two absorber columns. The rich solvent was regenerated in a stripper column by heating to drive off captured CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
. The system operated using a catch-and-release method where the CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
was separated to provide data on the process, but the captured CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
was released back into the host site stack. Aerosols and sulfur species were measured at multiple locations throughout the pilot-scale system. The inlet FGD and DCC removed much of the particulate matter and gaseous sulfur upstream of the WESP. With this configuration, the WESP achieved >
95% particulate capture. The new WESP did not show any of the increases in SO<
sub>
3<
/sub>
or other aerosol species that had been consistently observed with the larger-scale WESP installed immediately downstream of the plant?s full-scale FGD unit. Particulate samples captured and analyzed from the WESP inlet did not show any presence of crystalline sulfate materials, indicating that the pilot-scale FGD and DCC were efficient at reducing carryover from the plant?s full-scale FGD unit. A set of parametric tests were conducted on the new WESP to assess the impacts of flow rate, voltage, number of online WESP fields, and gas-phase sulfur content on aerosol and sulfur transformations. The results showed that the WESP performed similarly well at all sets of conditions. Sulfur and particulate matter exiting the WESP were further reduced through the absorber column as the amine-based solvent captured some of the residual contaminants. Solvent analysis showed that these species were slowly concentrating in the solvent over the duration of the test. When the WESP was taken offline and the sulfur slip through the FGD allowed to rise, the sulfate content in the solvent rose sharply, showing that the extra FGD and WESP were effective at reducing sulfate and cation uptake. This would be expected to extend amine-based solvent life by slowing the formation of heat-stable salts and other degradation products. This subtask was cofunded through the EERC?U.S. Department of Energy Joint Program on Research and Development for Fossil Energy-Related Resources Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FE0024233. Nonfederal funding was provided by the North Dakota Industrial Commission and MPC.